Identity Event Orchestration
Events may originate from web and mobile apps, backend systems, fraud engines, identity providers, call centers, payment systems, administrative tools, and trust-and-safety systems.
Armoreal Platform
Armoreal helps organizations add human identity trust to selected actions across the customer, member, employee, creator, and citizen lifecycle.
The Platform
Events may originate from web and mobile apps, backend systems, fraud engines, identity providers, call centers, payment systems, administrative tools, and trust-and-safety systems.
Policies may consider event type, risk level, channel, user group, amount threshold, recent identity changes, device risk, organizational rules, and manual escalation.
The person must understand what action is occurring, which organization initiated it, which account it affects, what happens after approval, and whether they approve or deny it.
Deepfake images and videos, cloned voices, stolen photographs, fake documents, replay attempts, synthetic identities, and unauthorized likeness usage.
Bank-to-customer communication, government requests, executive instructions, vendor-payment changes, family emergency requests, and sensitive platform requests.
${name} provides clear outcomes and appropriate records around protected identity events—whether involving digital content, a person’s image or likeness, a sensitive interaction, an account action, an approval, or a financial transaction. This helps organizations support trust, safety, fraud prevention, governance, and accountability without replacing their existing systems.
${name} is designed to work within existing digital ecosystems—from AI and content-generation platforms to enterprise applications, financial services, trust-and-safety workflows, and other identity-sensitive environments. Organizations can add stronger identity protection at the digital moments that matter most without replacing the systems they already rely on.
Proprietary technical architecture is shared through controlled evaluations and appropriate confidentiality arrangements.
Protection Areas
“Is the real identity holder knowingly entering this relationship?”
“Is the real person authorizing this identity change?”
“Is access being restored to the real account holder?”
“Should this identity-bound action be permitted to proceed?”
Additional verification should not create unnecessary friction for every transaction. Organizations determine when stronger human trust is justified.
“Has the real person authorized this use of their identity or likeness?”
“Can the user trust the party who initiated the action?”
Financial Institutions
An initial sandbox evaluation does not require full banking credentials, production customer data, card numbers, or replacement of existing fraud systems.
Start Small
01
Select one use case
02
Use simulated identities and events
03
Define organization-specific policy
04
Test legitimate user flows
05
Test adversarial scenarios
06
Measure completion, friction, and protection
07
Document recommendations